Saturday, February 14, 2009

Who are they?

Khmer Rouge victim remains at a memorial at Wat Troap Kor in Bati district
For the last few months, there has been lots of press talk about the possibility of at least another half dozen former Khmer Rouge leaders being charged under the current Khmer Rouge Tribunal process. There are five in custody today, four of them being part of the main central committee that made the 'big picture' decisions (Nuon Chea, Ieng Sary, Khieu Samphan, Ieng Thirith), the other is Duch, chief of the S-21 prison. But no-one has mentioned any names for these new half dozen suspects. I'm sure everyone at the court knows who they are and so do the press, but no-one is saying. You can guess why. And I'm sure that the former Khmer Rouge cadre still living in Pailin and Anlong Veng know whether they are likely suspects too. News that one of the inner circle, former KR Commerce Minister Van Rith, died in November in Kandal brings to light the need to get on with the main trial, and any additional trials, as quickly as feasible before ageing suspects and witnesses die. The question remains, who are these additional six suspects that International Prosecutor Robert Petit has submitted to the court? Well, two of them could be Sou Met and Meah Mut, the commanders of the air force and navy during the Khmer Rouge regime, both of whom were named by Stephen Heder in his book Seven Candidates for Prosecution. Others who remain alive and were part of the inner circle include ministers Thiounn Mumm and Keat Chhon (he's still a minister today); and Thiounn Prasith, who was the KR ambassador to the UN. However, less-senior cadre like Duch, and other prison chiefs and interrogators whose hands are covered in blood could also feature among the half dozen and those names are much harder to track down. It's still not clear whether more suspects will be taken into custody, but my view is that they should, and they must be included in the current trial that is unfolding. Too many have got away with too much for too long, it is time they were identified in public and brought to justice.



Blogger Andy Brouwer said...

Interestingly, and timely considering the question of more suspects being charged by the Khmer Rouge Tribunal is currently under investigation, one of the most likely of suspects, Meah Muth, has suggested that prosecuting more former KR leaders will "bring instability again," according to today's Cambodia Daily.
Muth, 70, and living in Samlot in Battambang province, was the chief of the KR Division 164 (including the navy) before becoming a government adviser after the KR disbanded. His comments match those of Cambodian co-prosecutor Chea Leang, who has opposed the idea of more suspects, as she feels it could destabilize the country. I can't see it myself but its a political hot potato here at the moment, and we shall see who wins the day in due course.

February 16, 2009 at 10:27 AM  
Blogger Andy Brouwer said...

Stephen Heder is a guy who knows his stuff. His book Seven Candidates for the Prosecution gave us an insight into the main Khmer Rouge leaders who could be brought to trial. He has also given an indication of who else should/could be considered for prosecution, though without naming any names for fear that they might take flight. However, I'm sure they already know who they are. Here's what he had to say in an article a while ago about who else could be brought into the scope of the tribunal.

...A glance at the history of the Khmer Rouge may help find the answer.When the CPK was in power, its senior leadership comprised some
20-30 members of the formal decision-making and policy-setting
Central Committee, based in the
capital, Phnom Penh. In addition, a corps of powerful cadre at both
the central and local level numbered perhaps 1,000 persons. Of the original 1975 leaders and corps of cadre, maybe fewer than half survived the purges that began to devastate the Party in 1976 and proceeded in waves through 1977 and 1978, and quite a few of those who made it through to the end of the regime have since died.

Even if the notional jurisdiction of
the EC were to extend down to the
most important local level, the district, it is likely that no more than a few hundred responsible individuals are still alive. The definitions “senior leaders” and “most responsible,” together with the available evidence, would determine how many of these could be legally targeted for serious
investigation, but my (very rough)
guess is that no more than 60 cases
would fit into these categories, including perhaps 10 senior leaders and 50 of their most responsible subordinates, i.e., those local leaders against whom there is specific evidence of individual responsibility for large scale

The names included in his book are the clearest candidates for prosecution. The others, including
less notorious central leaders and local cadre, are probably best not named at this time, as doing so might prompt them to go into hiding or take other steps to avoid arrest and trial.[end]

March 4, 2009 at 9:10 AM  
Blogger Andy Brouwer said...

I've mentioned Stephen Heder a few times in respect of the Khmer Rouge Tribunal. He is now back in the UK I believe having been working for the behind-the-scenes teams at the Tribunal, collecting evidence against the former Khmer Rouge leaders in custody.
Anyways. here's an article about him from 2001.

Interview with Steve Heder (2001) Bringing Justice to the Killing Fields

THE dour corridor of filing cabinets that Stephen Heder uses as an office at London's School of Oriental and African Studies might, on second thoughts, have been a better choice of venue for the interview.

Instead, we had opted for a bright yellow-walled cafe nestled in a side street near the British Museum. While fellow customers picked uneasily at lemon cakes and cappuccinos, Heder's flat American drawl described "smashings" - the Khmer Rouge's brutally uneuphemistic euphemism for political murder - and the death of two million people in the Cambodian killing fields.

Heder does not look like a hunter of mass murderers; more like a youngish Groucho Marx with lowered suspension, loping around Bloomsbury in a black leather jacket, blue jeans and motorcycle boots. This unlikely figure - the son of a dissident US army colonel who opposed the Vietnam war - knows the crimes of the Khmer Rouge in more nauseating forensic detail than anyone in the world.

If the old men responsible for killing a quarter of Cambodia's population between April 1975 and January 1979 are ever brought to justice, the case against them will rest largely on the hours Heder has spent in hot Cambodian reading rooms working through the paper trails left behind by their crimes.

Now working as a political scientist and lecturer on Cambodia at Soas, Heder has long outstayed his original assignment to the country as a budding war journalist in 1973. Fresh from an undergraduate degree at Cornell University in New York state, he pitched up in Phnom Penh in time to experience the terrifying last days of the pre-Khmer Rouge republic and the desperate hopes and fears of ordinary Cambodians about the kind of rule the Communists would bring when they came to power.

He left the US embassy on a helicopter as Pol Pot's men swept into town in 1975. Days later, he was attempting to sneak back into the country in a friend's plane (a ploy foiled when the DC-3 was grounded by the authorities at Bangkok airport). Ever since, as former colleagues in Phnom Penh's press pack have left their old stomping ground behind for more prestigious appointments and newer stories, Heder has kept returning to the country and the questions raised in those first dangerous steps of his career.

"Pol Pot, Nuon Chea, Ta Mok, Son Sen, Ieng Sary, Khieu Sary," he announces loudly to the cafe. "These names were a mystery to us before 1975. Bear in mind that the Communist Party denied its own existence until 1977, until two years after they took power. There were screens within screens, mirrors within mirrors. Even now, they have a slightly unreal ring to many people. The crimes have been well publicised, but it is difficult to imagine real people were responsible for them."

It is indeed hard not to doubt the reality of people responsible for death on so vast a scale. Hundreds of thousands were executed - probably half a million. More died because of starvation and disease directly caused by Khmer Rouge policies. Of the 17,000 people who passed through the gates of Tuol Sleng, the former secondary school used as the regime's main torture centre, seven survived. The official museum that now occupies the site describes newly born babies being smashed against trees to save the expense of a bullet, old men carried to torture because they could not walk, naked women shackled to beds and stung to death by specially reared scorpions. According to Heder, the sense of unreality surrounding these horrors reaches into the minds of their perpetrators. "You must understand that these men are operating according to a script," he says. "They feel no individual responsibility themselves." They became communists in the early 1950s and spent years in Paris, Vietnam and, Beijing reading Stalin and Mao, Heder says. What they found, in a somewhat rarefied form, was the message that at some stage in the revolution, it was necessary to go after the traitors within. They combined this with the idea, fed to them from Mao, that when problems occur in communism, the solution was more communism.

"When things start to go wrong, as they inevitably do, with their attempt to jump straight to full-blown communism, they go back to the script," Heder says. "The economy is not producing enough food for the people, which they are not prepared to admit because they have done everything theoretically right, so the policies must be being sabotaged by spies. They purge and they further weaken the party, and there are more problems, so they purge again."

He says it is an eerie experience meeting these people now. "They still sort of re-imagine modern Cambodia as if it is mid-1940s Indo-China, with the Vietnamese substituted for the Japanese and the Americans as the French. I was totally persuaded that, although it is sheer fantasy, they are sincere. This is a world of imagination."

For most surviving members of the Khmer Rouge leadership, life since the disintegration of their guerrilla forces between 1996 and 1998 has been rather pleasant. Today, Brother Number Two Nuon Chea, the man primarily responsible for devising the killing machine, lives undisturbed in Cambodia. Khieu Samphan, a leading figure in the regime, is his neighbour. Ieng Sary, Pol Pot's brother in law who encouraged executions within his foreign ministry, was given an amnesty in 1996. Only Ta Mok, the brutal regional commander nicknamed "The Butcher", and Kaing Khek Iev, the warden of Tuol Sleng, are in custody.

Despite recent moves towards an international tribunal, Cambodia's government, led by the strongman Hun Sen, has a declared policy of ignoring the pasts of former Khmer Rouge leaders. While paying lip service to the idea of an internationally supervised trial, Hun Sen, a former junior Khmer Rouge cadre himself, has consistently obstructed progress on the grounds that his government must have control of the process.

The government must wish Heder had not returned to Cambodia in 1992. After his evacuation from Phnom Penh in 1975, he shelved journalism's shifting news agendas in favour of research on Cambodia at Cornell. Four years later, he was conducting interviews of thousands of refugees on the Thai-Cambodian border, trying to assess the human rights situation in the country after its invasion by Vietnam (this earned him his favourite boast: "I am in John Pilger's Heroes as a villain."). He was appointed an area specialist by Amnesty International, and he returned to Cambodia in 1992 to work as the UN peacekeeping mission's Khmer Rouge expert.

A stubbornly intellectual man, he has, when necessary, shown the same capacity for action that led him to Cambodia as a young graduate. In June 1997, he was the chief organiser of a daring attempt to smuggle out Pol Pot, who had just been detained by Ta Mok for the killing of Son Sen. Heder tried to work out an arrangement with Cambodian military officers to fly Pol Pot out of Cambodia and transfer him to a venue of universal jurisdiction. But Ta Mok could not be convinced to hand him over.

Pol Pot's death the following year put an end to hopes of a trial. But, if the lunge for Pol Pot was Heder's most dramatic move, his most significant has come in its aftermath, in three quiet years spent deciphering bureaucratic Khmer in the reading rooms of the Documentation Centre of Cambodia.

The product of that research, a 129-page report titled Seven Candidates for Prosecution: Accountability for the Crimes of the Khmer Rouge, co-authored by the human rights lawyer Brian Tittemore, was published in June. For the first time, it exposed Khmer Rouge leaders' individual guilt. It traced hundreds of individual communications between the leadership and subordinates and proved direct involvement of people at the highest level of the regime.

It reads as a legal case waiting to be put. After 20 years of obfuscation, fiction and evasion, Cambodia has the opportunity to confront its past and the reality of the old men who killed a quarter of a nation. Nearly half a year after its publication, however, a UN-Cambodian government agreement on where this evidence could be heard has not appeared.

Chris Bunting, Times Higher Education Supplement, December 2001

March 8, 2009 at 3:50 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Newer›  ‹Older